Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14581 - 14590 of 30072 for de.
Search results 14581 - 14590 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor” exists meriting sentence modification is a question of law we review de novo. Id. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85979 - 2014-09-15
factor” exists meriting sentence modification is a question of law we review de novo. Id. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James L. Stocking v. Cynthia M. Stocking
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Novak v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 133, 136, 515
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4374 - 2017-09-19
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Novak v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 133, 136, 515
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4374 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
). The trial court denied the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
). The trial court denied the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
and then review the application of statute to those facts, a question of law that is reviewed de novo. See City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15419 - 2017-09-21
and then review the application of statute to those facts, a question of law that is reviewed de novo. See City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15419 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 961.41(1x) is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Smith, 189 Wis. 2d 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137813 - 2017-09-21
. § 961.41(1x) is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Smith, 189 Wis. 2d 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the limitation on cross-examination violates that right is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74965 - 2014-09-15
the limitation on cross-examination violates that right is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74965 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 157
de novo. Coutts v. Wisconsin Ret. Bd., 209 Wis. 2d 655, 663, 562 N.W.2d 917 (1997). ¶12 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29096 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Coutts v. Wisconsin Ret. Bd., 209 Wis. 2d 655, 663, 562 N.W.2d 917 (1997). ¶12 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29096 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9213 - 2017-09-19
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9213 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous standard; next, we review whether the facts meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard; next, we review whether the facts meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15