Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14581 - 14590 of 68292 for did.
Search results 14581 - 14590 of 68292 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Paul R. Brzycki
? PAUL BRZYCKI: Right, I did. No. 03-3541-CR 5 At no time during the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7198 - 2017-09-20
? PAUL BRZYCKI: Right, I did. No. 03-3541-CR 5 At no time during the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7198 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Chase Conners
climbed up the steps to the porch and peered through the screen door into the mobile home. He did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2265 - 2017-09-19
climbed up the steps to the porch and peered through the screen door into the mobile home. He did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2265 - 2017-09-19
Judith L. Marshe v. Patrick B. Sheehan
….” Sheehan did not testify. His girlfriend testified that Sheehan did not tell her that Marshe was coming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11114 - 2005-03-31
….” Sheehan did not testify. His girlfriend testified that Sheehan did not tell her that Marshe was coming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11114 - 2005-03-31
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
Tesar and another man whom Zink did not know. Stodola refused to sell Zink any crank at that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
Tesar and another man whom Zink did not know. Stodola refused to sell Zink any crank at that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury found grounds did not exist to terminate R.G.’s parental rights. N.C. contends her appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876587 - 2024-11-20
a jury found grounds did not exist to terminate R.G.’s parental rights. N.C. contends her appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876587 - 2024-11-20
State v. Owen Johnson
and seizure of evidence did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We, therefore, affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9395 - 2005-03-31
and seizure of evidence did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We, therefore, affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
payment. Specifically, Christy argues that the circuit court did not follow its stated intent to divide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54971 - 2014-09-15
payment. Specifically, Christy argues that the circuit court did not follow its stated intent to divide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54971 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the time period of the charged sexual assaults and that the State did not specify in the criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97633 - 2014-09-15
of the time period of the charged sexual assaults and that the State did not specify in the criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97633 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
, 334 N.W.2d 559 (Ct. App. 1983). We look to whether Schwartz established a sufficient reason why he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2014-07-08
, 334 N.W.2d 559 (Ct. App. 1983). We look to whether Schwartz established a sufficient reason why he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2014-07-08
State v. Carmen L. Harrell
) by deciding that the new(ly declared) factor did not frustrate the sentencing court’s original intent; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25835 - 2006-08-29
) by deciding that the new(ly declared) factor did not frustrate the sentencing court’s original intent; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25835 - 2006-08-29