Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14581 - 14590 of 50071 for our.
Search results 14581 - 14590 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Sanders’s no-contest plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189361 - 2017-09-21
Sanders’s no-contest plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
trial. Cory contends that the trial court erred in multiple respects and was biased. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015742 - 2025-10-01
trial. Cory contends that the trial court erred in multiple respects and was biased. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015742 - 2025-10-01
State v. Genevieve M. Pauser
. [1] Our decision makes it unnecessary to delay our opinion, as the State suggests, until the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6520 - 2005-03-31
. [1] Our decision makes it unnecessary to delay our opinion, as the State suggests, until the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is clearly erroneous.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
is clearly erroneous.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
State v. Joseph D. Haas
be reached by a reasonable person. See id. at 664, 370 N.W.2d at 249. Our standard of review is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12267 - 2005-03-31
be reached by a reasonable person. See id. at 664, 370 N.W.2d at 249. Our standard of review is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12267 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
.” The trial court, however, citing our decision in Pozo’s first appeal, reasoned that it was “basically a moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12275 - 2005-03-31
.” The trial court, however, citing our decision in Pozo’s first appeal, reasoned that it was “basically a moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Sturm
court found, and our supreme court agreed, that reasonable inferences from the facts supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
court found, and our supreme court agreed, that reasonable inferences from the facts supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶10 Meanwhile, our review of whether an action was continued frivolously presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99529 - 2014-09-15
). ¶10 Meanwhile, our review of whether an action was continued frivolously presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99529 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is clearly erroneous.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
is clearly erroneous.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735400 - 2023-12-05
right to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735400 - 2023-12-05