Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14591 - 14600 of 65710 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 14591 - 14600 of 65710 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Jean H.
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP2228-CRNM 2 the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143682 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2228-CRNM 2 the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143682 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Bradley could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144238 - 2015-07-06
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Bradley could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144238 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not in the record, but is undisputed between the parties. No. 2008AP1974 3 ¶4 On March 24, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34800 - 2014-09-15
is not in the record, but is undisputed between the parties. No. 2008AP1974 3 ¶4 On March 24, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
State v. John H. H., Jr.
that are unsupported by proper citation to legal and record authority. Because John H. H., Jr.’s briefs do not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
that are unsupported by proper citation to legal and record authority. Because John H. H., Jr.’s briefs do not meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Rodgers
it wanted to review the medical records relating to Rodgers's condition. Finally, on October 5, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11061 - 2017-09-19
it wanted to review the medical records relating to Rodgers's condition. Finally, on October 5, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11061 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit report, and response, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96145 - 2014-09-15
of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit report, and response, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96145 - 2014-09-15