Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14591 - 14600 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 14591 - 14600 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Rosemary G. O'Brien v. Craig P. O'Brien
awarding primary placement of the children to her former husband, Craig O'Brien. She argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14679 - 2005-03-31
awarding primary placement of the children to her former husband, Craig O'Brien. She argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14679 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R.W.
that at the plea hearing where Stacey admitted the allegations contained in the petitions, he trial court neglected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31
that at the plea hearing where Stacey admitted the allegations contained in the petitions, he trial court neglected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R.W.
that at the plea hearing where Stacey admitted the allegations contained in the petitions, he trial court neglected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
that at the plea hearing where Stacey admitted the allegations contained in the petitions, he trial court neglected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Insurance Company (Progressive) after Martin failed to appear at the trial. Martin’s motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
Insurance Company (Progressive) after Martin failed to appear at the trial. Martin’s motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Ross asserts he was denied effective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Ross asserts he was denied effective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the firearm possession charge. The State also asked the trial court to strike language in the criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220427 - 2018-10-02
in the firearm possession charge. The State also asked the trial court to strike language in the criminal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220427 - 2018-10-02
Pamela Sue Sieben v. Bruce Raymond Sieben
and an order denying her motions for reconsideration.[1] She argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12442 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying her motions for reconsideration.[1] She argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12442 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott C. Anderson
that Anderson has failed to make a prima facie showing that trial counsel’s representation was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12332 - 2005-03-31
that Anderson has failed to make a prima facie showing that trial counsel’s representation was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12332 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The undisputed “date of taking” was November 10, 2011. 2 Bluemound appealed the award’s adequacy to the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21
). The undisputed “date of taking” was November 10, 2011. 2 Bluemound appealed the award’s adequacy to the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley D. Sallay
relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13070 - 2017-09-21
relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13070 - 2017-09-21