Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1461 - 1470 of 70109 for his.
Search results 1461 - 1470 of 70109 for his.
COURT OF APPEALS
murder, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.03 (2001‑02),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
murder, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.03 (2001‑02),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Robert M. Anderson, Jr. appeals his judgment of conviction after entering pleas to charges of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448503 - 2021-11-02
. Robert M. Anderson, Jr. appeals his judgment of conviction after entering pleas to charges of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448503 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1958-CR 2 denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32111 - 2014-09-15
Statutes are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1958-CR 2 denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32111 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5208 - 2017-09-19
failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5208 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert C. Niebuhr
C. Niebuhr appeals from a court order revoking his driving privileges for refusal to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31
C. Niebuhr appeals from a court order revoking his driving privileges for refusal to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5209 - 2017-09-19
failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5209 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial and affirming his convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
of the circuit court denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial and affirming his convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68451 - 2011-07-26
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
court’s failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5208 - 2005-03-31
court’s failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5208 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Borst
to the police on November 1, 2002, the day of his arrest. We conclude that the suppression motion was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
to the police on November 1, 2002, the day of his arrest. We conclude that the suppression motion was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
State v. David Borst
on November 1, 2002, the day of his arrest. We conclude that the suppression motion was properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19310 - 2017-09-21
on November 1, 2002, the day of his arrest. We conclude that the suppression motion was properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19310 - 2017-09-21