Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1461 - 1470 of 2401 for nys.
Search results 1461 - 1470 of 2401 for nys.
State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
. § 948.22(2) provides that “[a]ny person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6621 - 2005-03-31
. § 948.22(2) provides that “[a]ny person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6621 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
then rejected the City's argument for relief under § 806.07(1)(h), STATS.—that is, for “[a]ny other reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7842 - 2017-09-19
then rejected the City's argument for relief under § 806.07(1)(h), STATS.—that is, for “[a]ny other reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7842 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
requires application of the long-settled rule, applied in Von Uhl and many other cases, that “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118787 - 2014-07-30
requires application of the long-settled rule, applied in Von Uhl and many other cases, that “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118787 - 2014-07-30
[PDF]
Order-SC
Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311669 - 2020-12-03
Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311669 - 2020-12-03
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. Gerald Berge
[1] including “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” § 806.07(1)(a), and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13844 - 2005-03-31
[1] including “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” § 806.07(1)(a), and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13844 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gregory T. Isermann v. MBL Life Assurance Corporation
his claim for a declaratory judgment because § 806.04(2), STATS., provides that “[a]ny person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14577 - 2017-09-21
his claim for a declaratory judgment because § 806.04(2), STATS., provides that “[a]ny person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in applying the appropriate charging and penalty statutes is in avoiding an ex post facto violation. “[A]ny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709013 - 2023-10-03
in applying the appropriate charging and penalty statutes is in avoiding an ex post facto violation. “[A]ny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709013 - 2023-10-03
State v. Michael Doud
restitution context, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid out because of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31
restitution context, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid out because of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31
Stan's Lumber, Inc. v. Gary P. Fleming
“[a]ny activity to which the parties might have been bound was in the future and remained to be done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7876 - 2005-03-31
“[a]ny activity to which the parties might have been bound was in the future and remained to be done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7876 - 2005-03-31
R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
conduct” includes “[a]ny practice or conduct which tends to constitute a danger to the health, welfare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
conduct” includes “[a]ny practice or conduct which tends to constitute a danger to the health, welfare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31