Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14601 - 14610 of 29968 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14601 - 14610 of 29968 for consulta de causas.
County of Dunn v. Joseph W. Uetz
. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the circuit court's opinion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5130 - 2005-03-31
. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the circuit court's opinion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79392 - 2012-03-12
issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79392 - 2012-03-12
State v. Michael J. Larson
. Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. Babbitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9486 - 2014-12-28
. Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. Babbitt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9486 - 2014-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presented sufficient grounds for relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Because nothing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12
presented sufficient grounds for relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Because nothing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to these facts de novo. Id. ¶9 Under the facts of this case, the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2009-03-23
to these facts de novo. Id. ¶9 Under the facts of this case, the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2009-03-23
City of Waupun v. Troy G. Hermans
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13379 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13379 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew K. Green
, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15824 - 2005-03-31
, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15824 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
N.W.2d 153. The methodology and standards establishing our de novo review of a trial court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 153. The methodology and standards establishing our de novo review of a trial court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Catina A. McCoy
are undisputed, this court reviews the trial court's legal conclusion de novo. State v. Goodrum, 152 Wis.2d 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20
are undisputed, this court reviews the trial court's legal conclusion de novo. State v. Goodrum, 152 Wis.2d 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164090 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164090 - 2017-09-21