Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14601 - 14610 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14601 - 14610 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
declaratory relief depends on a question of law, our review is de novo.” Id. Here, the declaratory relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
declaratory relief depends on a question of law, our review is de novo.” Id. Here, the declaratory relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131889 - 2014-12-17
State v. David R. Messner
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need not consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15553 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need not consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15553 - 2005-03-31
State v. James W.
“clearly erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25338 - 2006-05-30
“clearly erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25338 - 2006-05-30
State v. Robert J. Waldron
, which we review de novo.” Id., ¶11. ¶10 Wisconsin JI—Criminal 830, privilege of defense of others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20096 - 2005-11-01
, which we review de novo.” Id., ¶11. ¶10 Wisconsin JI—Criminal 830, privilege of defense of others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20096 - 2005-11-01
State v. Paul M. Nigl
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Nigl claims that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6220 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Nigl claims that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d at 316 (citation omitted). ¶13 Hamilton contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74282 - 2011-11-22
of law, which we review de novo. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d at 316 (citation omitted). ¶13 Hamilton contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74282 - 2011-11-22
State v. Joshua Jenkins
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
plain view. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a reason sufficient to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21
a reason sufficient to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21