Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 29995 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 29995 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶10 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186322 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION ¶10 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. Here, Gilmore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68895 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. Here, Gilmore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law which this court reviews de novo. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d at 547. Once the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30223 - 2014-09-15
of law which this court reviews de novo. Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d at 547. Once the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30223 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9471 - 2005-03-31
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9471 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. John P. Kavanaugh
, whether it meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9960 - 2005-03-31
, whether it meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9960 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Brandon J. Green
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21
great deference to the magistrate’s decision, rather than reviewing the matter de novo. See id. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15511 - 2017-09-21
State v. Quinton K. Washington
, and the questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
, and the questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31