Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164090 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164090 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
of review is not de novo, but rather gives “great deference” to the determination of the issuing judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12919 - 2017-09-21
of review is not de novo, but rather gives “great deference” to the determination of the issuing judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Harris
justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9175 - 2017-09-19
justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9175 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K., 2020 WI 8, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
WI APP 226
This is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Garcia v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30363 - 2014-09-15
This is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See Garcia v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30363 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we apply de novo review to the application of constitutional principles to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134240 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but we apply de novo review to the application of constitutional principles to those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134240 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
Donna Sue Spielman v. Jeffrey Allen Spielman
the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis. 2d 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3030 - 2017-09-19
the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis. 2d 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Neil Montoto
instruction violated a defendant’s constitutional rights by misleading the jury is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5371 - 2017-09-19
instruction violated a defendant’s constitutional rights by misleading the jury is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5371 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21