Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 68530 for did.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 68530 for did.
Barbara J. Delzer v. Donald L. Delzer
) that the circuit court erred in finding as a matter of fact that the parties did not have an oral agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20566 - 2005-12-07
) that the circuit court erred in finding as a matter of fact that the parties did not have an oral agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20566 - 2005-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
witnesses to testify on his behalf. He also argues that his pleas were involuntary because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
witnesses to testify on his behalf. He also argues that his pleas were involuntary because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
heard knocking on the door, but did not hear any “police” announcement. She explained that she “thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69104 - 2011-08-08
heard knocking on the door, but did not hear any “police” announcement. She explained that she “thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69104 - 2011-08-08
Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
. Jensen did not order a complete electrolyte panel to determine the cause of these ailments. Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14786 - 2005-03-31
. Jensen did not order a complete electrolyte panel to determine the cause of these ailments. Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14786 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
court denied the motion, concluding that, under existing case law, the dog sniff did not constitute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
court denied the motion, concluding that, under existing case law, the dog sniff did not constitute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113224 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1984). Here, the motion that Hamilton filed did not demonstrate that he was entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786643 - 2024-04-11
(1984). Here, the motion that Hamilton filed did not demonstrate that he was entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786643 - 2024-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
$1,682.50. When Carmichael did not cure the default, Landmark commenced a small claims replevin action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
$1,682.50. When Carmichael did not cure the default, Landmark commenced a small claims replevin action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
colloquy was insufficient because the circuit court did not properly ascertain Austin’s understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638661 - 2023-03-28
colloquy was insufficient because the circuit court did not properly ascertain Austin’s understanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638661 - 2023-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
counsel was ineffective because he did not challenge the admissibility of incriminating statements she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28512 - 2007-03-19
counsel was ineffective because he did not challenge the admissibility of incriminating statements she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28512 - 2007-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
because the prosecutor properly recited the crime and penalties, as did the circuit court during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29986 - 2007-08-15
because the prosecutor properly recited the crime and penalties, as did the circuit court during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29986 - 2007-08-15