Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 69007 for had.

State v. Lawrence C. Pitcher
questioning, eventually eliciting an admission that Pitcher had indeed agreed to the illegal tagging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12366 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert C. Braun
that the element was not in dispute or that it had already been proved or determined by the court. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12045 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the police had a reasonable suspicion to conduct the pat-down search for weapons based on the facts found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72333 - 2011-10-17

COURT OF APPEALS
be considered illusory because Brookstone had already partially performed under the contract by purchasing some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29382 - 2007-06-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶5 We conclude that the police had a reasonable suspicion to conduct the pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72333 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an odor of intoxicants being masked with chewing gum. Duncan admitted he had been drinking and had just
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549701 - 2022-08-02

Mayville Die & Tool, Inc. v. Weller Machinery Company
in question had been manufactured in the 1980’s, had hardly cut any chips, and was in excellent shape. Weller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4048 - 2005-05-02

State v. Alexander Grubor
not have been a surprise since the court had previously ruled the evidence admissible. ¶3 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4237 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ann K. Beglinger
that based on a radar reading and his personal observations he had a reasonable suspicion that defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8429 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James A. Shives v. William L. Powell
that they, rather than Powell, had the burden of proof. The facts that the circuit court specifically adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15539 - 2017-09-21