Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 64217 for records.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 64217 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Obea Hayes
- independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, this court concludes there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11803 - 2017-09-21
- independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, this court concludes there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11803 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243911 - 2019-07-24
independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243911 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227400 - 2018-11-15
a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227400 - 2018-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
at 717. To determine subjective bias, we inquire “whether the record reflects that the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31953 - 2008-02-27
at 717. To determine subjective bias, we inquire “whether the record reflects that the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31953 - 2008-02-27
CA Blank Order
) (2011-12).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the orders of the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113464 - 2014-06-03
) (2011-12).[1] Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the orders of the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113464 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, and the response, as mandated by Anders.3 We conclude there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267308 - 2020-07-07
the record, the no-merit report, and the response, as mandated by Anders.3 We conclude there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267308 - 2020-07-07
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
citation in the record contains no such language on its reverse side. Additionally, the various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
citation in the record contains no such language on its reverse side. Additionally, the various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
petition for waiver of transcript fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745130 - 2023-12-27
petition for waiver of transcript fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745130 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s no-merit report, and Lakesha’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107338 - 2017-09-21
a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s no-merit report, and Lakesha’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107338 - 2017-09-21