Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 64040 for records/1000.

American Motors Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
examiner then examines the record to determine if there was any credible evidence which would demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8060 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91979 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
consider: the defendant's past record of criminal offenses; the defendant's history of undesirable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9010 - 2017-09-19

Rosemarie Pitz v. Bernard Pitz
, the circuit court found that Bernard’s warranty deed was not recorded until April 14, 1992,[1] after Cecelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14625 - 2005-03-31

State v. Raymond T. Bradley
criminal record and the seriousness of the offense. ¶6 Our standard of review is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2909 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223851 - 2018-10-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359248 - 2021-04-22

CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98819 - 2013-06-27

Jon A. Haas v. Vance R. Stark
decisions if the record shows that the court “logically interpreted the facts and applied the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2964 - 2005-03-31

Dodge County v. Noah P.A.
and discussing the facts of another case. However, a review of the record demonstrates that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13412 - 2005-03-31