Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 58500 for speedy trial.
State v. Frank A. H.
the effectiveness of trial counsel at sentencing. On appeal, he argues that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5061 - 2005-03-31
the effectiveness of trial counsel at sentencing. On appeal, he argues that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5061 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1590-CR 2 contends the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28813 - 2014-09-15
are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1590-CR 2 contends the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28813 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Daniel W. Miller
-2- contends that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his request to admit a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11220 - 2017-09-19
-2- contends that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his request to admit a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
on the basis that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion relating to whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
on the basis that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion relating to whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. Lipson appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106737 - 2014-01-14
. Lipson appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106737 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
on the basis that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion relating to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
on the basis that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion relating to whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
State v. Warren J. Hampton
relief. The issue is whether postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to raise trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26265 - 2006-08-21
relief. The issue is whether postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to raise trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26265 - 2006-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Stacy L. Blunt
the No. 96-3237-CR 2 trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11680 - 2017-09-19
the No. 96-3237-CR 2 trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Stanley D. Sallay
relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13070 - 2017-09-21
relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13070 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Alfonzo T. Young
. Alfonzo T. Young, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21
. Alfonzo T. Young, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16280 - 2017-09-21