Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14611 - 14620 of 20868 for word.

State v. James M. Moran
should assign the words in the statute their ordinarily accepted meaning. Id. The court may also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18971 - 2005-07-11

Xuebiao Yao v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
the existence of “substantial evidence in view of the entire record,” which were the words in the federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4285 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
—“at least the same ten jurors should agree in all the answers”— was incorrectly worded 10 for a situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163871 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
Reinsurance Corp., 797 F. Supp. 363, 368-69 (D.N.J. 1992). We agree with Hydrite that the broadly-worded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11003 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
relinquishment or abandonment of a known right."[20] The words "forfeiture" and "waiver" are often (incorrectly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133439 - 2015-01-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) it was “clear” that Amy was seeking a modification of child support. In other words, the court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992754 - 2025-08-05

WI App 120 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP921-W Complete Title ...
of inherent authority. ¶3 We conclude that the record, particularly the trial court’s own words in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87872 - 2012-11-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a few feet from her, and he was also, in the words of the prosecutor as affirmed by A.B., “yelling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588442 - 2022-11-10

Lori Bell v. Mae Neugart
relates. ¶17 Although the wording of the statute is cumbersome, the core meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4397 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
there was no legal need for one.” In other words, Dalton was trying “to impose a legal requirement on law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193161 - 2017-09-21