Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14631 - 14640 of 84336 for case number.
Search results 14631 - 14640 of 84336 for case number.
State v. Darryl A. Harding
nonetheless conclude that he simply lacked sufficient facts necessary to justify the stop in this case. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
nonetheless conclude that he simply lacked sufficient facts necessary to justify the stop in this case. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
meritorious arguments. We conclude that is the case here. ¶16 Durigan’s brief offers a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41950 - 2014-09-15
meritorious arguments. We conclude that is the case here. ¶16 Durigan’s brief offers a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41950 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James H. Dumke
2001 WI 122 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1338-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16509 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 122 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1338-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16509 - 2017-09-21
Steven Levsen v. Medical College of Wisconsin
was excused at that time. The medical college then called Ms. Rinke during its case; it is during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15252 - 2005-03-31
was excused at that time. The medical college then called Ms. Rinke during its case; it is during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vonnie D. Darby v. Jon Litscher
2002 WI App 258 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5160 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 258 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5160 - 2017-09-19
City of Sheboygan v. Alonna L. Koenig
in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS ¶2 On August 20, 2002, City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6625 - 2005-03-31
in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS ¶2 On August 20, 2002, City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bill's Distributing, Ltd. v. Gerald Cormican
2002 WI App 156 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2567
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4413 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 156 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2567
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4413 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and lucid when I’ve talked to him, he’s understood the facts of the case, the law, his options, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
and lucid when I’ve talked to him, he’s understood the facts of the case, the law, his options, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this procedure “a number of times” and, therefore, knew or should have known that the trap was metal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181189 - 2017-09-21
this procedure “a number of times” and, therefore, knew or should have known that the trap was metal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181189 - 2017-09-21
City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
this number instead of the vehicle’s “gross vehicle weight rating” of some 14,000 pounds results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31
this number instead of the vehicle’s “gross vehicle weight rating” of some 14,000 pounds results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31