Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14631 - 14640 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14631 - 14640 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
). Whether counsel performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99032 - 2013-07-09
State v. Sean M. Daley
with a statutory interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2011-10-11
with a statutory interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2011-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18
[PDF]
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. I. Reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34697 - 2014-09-15
. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. I. Reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34697 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the constitutional issue de novo. Id., ¶19; State v. Payano-Roman, 2006 WI 47, ¶16, 290 Wis. 2d 380, 714 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38746 - 2014-09-15
to the constitutional issue de novo. Id., ¶19; State v. Payano-Roman, 2006 WI 47, ¶16, 290 Wis. 2d 380, 714 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38746 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Kueht
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5152 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5152 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
St. Croix County v. Adam Douglas Cress
constitutional rights is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3353 - 2017-09-19
constitutional rights is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3353 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on certiorari review, a court does not reweigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. See Roberts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350062 - 2021-03-30
on certiorari review, a court does not reweigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. See Roberts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350062 - 2021-03-30
[PDF]
Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke, 222 Wis.2d 530, 536, 587 N.W.2d 904, 906
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke, 222 Wis.2d 530, 536, 587 N.W.2d 904, 906
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21