Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14631 - 14640 of 29772 for des.
Search results 14631 - 14640 of 29772 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 292 Wis. 2d 716, 715 N.W.2d 727. Whether a sentence is ambiguous is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
, 292 Wis. 2d 716, 715 N.W.2d 727. Whether a sentence is ambiguous is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Harris, 2008 WI 15, ¶15, 307 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201651 - 2017-11-09
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Harris, 2008 WI 15, ¶15, 307 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201651 - 2017-11-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Popke, 317 Wis. 2d 118, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58132 - 2014-09-15
of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Popke, 317 Wis. 2d 118, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 30
§ 939.74. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. See West v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240942 - 2019-07-09
§ 939.74. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. See West v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240942 - 2019-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Waites
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181878 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181878 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Christine Magnuson Stanfield v. Paul E. Magnuson
This appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7373 - 2017-09-20
This appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7373 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143768 - 2017-09-21
. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Urdahl, 2005 WI App 191, ¶11, 286 Wis. 2d 476, 704 N.W.2d 324 (citation omitted). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395050 - 2021-07-21
. Urdahl, 2005 WI App 191, ¶11, 286 Wis. 2d 476, 704 N.W.2d 324 (citation omitted). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395050 - 2021-07-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts are questions of law that this court decides de novo. See Barron Elec. Coop. v. PSC, 212 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180506 - 2017-09-21
facts are questions of law that this court decides de novo. See Barron Elec. Coop. v. PSC, 212 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180506 - 2017-09-21