Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14631 - 14640 of 20373 for sai.

Kevin J. Pok v. David E. McCauley
didn't you do it before we started this case, this trial? You knew, perhaps, what you were going to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8318 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Elmer J. K.
that he believed that Elmer had nine adjudications in tribal court. No. 98-2067 10 saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Regal Ware, Inc. v. TSCO Corporation
is improper. See id. Here, we cannot say as a matter of law that the forty-five-days notice supplied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14100 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael Cruz
examination during the 1983 trial he stated he could hear the interpreter and understand what she was saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7821 - 2005-03-31

State v. Douglas P. Bourque
that the prosecutor’s remarks were “on the strident side.” Although the prosecutor apologized, he went on to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14884 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ronald V. Kurszewski
that an analysis of a plea agreement under standard contract law leads to the same result. We went on to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9198 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randall K. Mataya
testimony by explaining that only once did Hertel explicitly say he was “bullshitting” investigators to get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13671 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kimberly Paswaters v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
wanted to hear what Kim had to say. ¶7 Kim called back thirty to forty-five minutes after Harold left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7332 - 2017-09-20

Joshua Scheideler v. Smith & Associates, Inc.
that the effect of General Casualty's position is to permit a double recovery, precisely what Trible says may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10331 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in anyway and they ignored what she had to say.” On review of a jury’s verdict, we view the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520794 - 2022-05-17