Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14641 - 14650 of 30177 for de.
Search results 14641 - 14650 of 30177 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61310 - 2011-03-16
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61310 - 2011-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
State v. Tim G. Frauchiger
). Whether undisputed facts show probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5681 - 2005-03-31
). Whether undisputed facts show probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5681 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶10 Our review of the grant of a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128303 - 2014-11-18
. ¶10 Our review of the grant of a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128303 - 2014-11-18
Kevin Giffin v. Gary Poetzl
of Review ¶6 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Goldblatt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3088 - 2005-03-31
of Review ¶6 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Goldblatt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3088 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 101.11, presenting a question of law that we review de novo. See Barry v. Employers Mut. Cas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37948 - 2009-07-21
. Stat. § 101.11, presenting a question of law that we review de novo. See Barry v. Employers Mut. Cas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37948 - 2009-07-21
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9213 - 2005-03-31
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9213 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
). The trial court’s dismissal of the counterclaim presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38744 - 2009-08-03
). The trial court’s dismissal of the counterclaim presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38744 - 2009-08-03
COURT OF APPEALS
or a lien were questions of law subject to de novo review. Only the circuit court’s decision whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102089 - 2013-09-23
or a lien were questions of law subject to de novo review. Only the circuit court’s decision whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102089 - 2013-09-23