Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 29772 for des.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 29772 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo. See id. ¶8 In sum, controlling law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we decide de novo. See id. ¶8 In sum, controlling law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
3 Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands the proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40272 - 2014-09-15
3 Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands the proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40272 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21
State v. Quinton K. Washington
, and the questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
, and the questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginold B. Trussell
reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment to the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15732 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment to the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15732 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence Northern
. § 971.23 is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2009-08-17
. § 971.23 is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2009-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, though we review de novo the ultimate conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, though we review de novo the ultimate conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of such a right is a constitutional question we review de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104443 - 2017-09-21
of such a right is a constitutional question we review de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104443 - 2017-09-21
City of Nekoosa v. Steven J. Melin
questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 713, 503 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15652 - 2005-03-31
questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 713, 503 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15652 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. Brown v. LIRC, 2003 WI 142, ¶13, 267 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83148 - 2012-05-30
weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. Brown v. LIRC, 2003 WI 142, ¶13, 267 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83148 - 2012-05-30