Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 29823 for des.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 29823 for des.
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9213 - 2005-03-31
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9213 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carrie L. Drew
of record constitute probable cause is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12801 - 2005-03-31
of record constitute probable cause is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12801 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a matter of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28779 - 2007-04-23
is a matter of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28779 - 2007-04-23
State v. Jeffrey Sailing
any of the factual findings made by the trial court, we review de novo the question of law: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11936 - 2005-03-31
any of the factual findings made by the trial court, we review de novo the question of law: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo, so the State’s argument about the precise reasoning of the circuit court as to why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21
is de novo, so the State’s argument about the precise reasoning of the circuit court as to why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21
County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5311 - 2013-03-31
) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5311 - 2013-03-31
State v. Johnnie A. Trotter
court acted within these powers is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5331 - 2005-03-31
court acted within these powers is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5331 - 2005-03-31
Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
)(a). ¶7 Whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
)(a). ¶7 Whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact that we review de novo without deference to the [circuit] court.” State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
fact that we review de novo without deference to the [circuit] court.” State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the doctrine of claim preclusion is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Kruckenberg v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
of the doctrine of claim preclusion is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Kruckenberg v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15