Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 63531 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Otis J. Martin
an affirmative duty to examine the record and question the defendant and/or counsel in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13734 - 2014-09-15
an affirmative duty to examine the record and question the defendant and/or counsel in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dodge Co. Department of Human Services v. Rachel W.
pursuant to Section 908.03(6), Stats. [Records of regularly conducted activity]. ¶8 That is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3193 - 2017-09-19
pursuant to Section 908.03(6), Stats. [Records of regularly conducted activity]. ¶8 That is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3193 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frank T. White v. Richard Raemisch
hearing at which it was discussed have been included in the appellate record. However, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15778 - 2017-09-21
hearing at which it was discussed have been included in the appellate record. However, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin D.K.
will search the record for evidence to support the trial court’s findings of fact. See Becker v. Zoschke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3990 - 2017-09-20
will search the record for evidence to support the trial court’s findings of fact. See Becker v. Zoschke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3990 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Peterson
), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS. Peterson filed a response. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11888 - 2017-09-21
), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS. Peterson filed a response. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11888 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644887 - 2023-04-19
upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644887 - 2023-04-19
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137663 - 2015-03-17
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137663 - 2015-03-17
American Motors Corporation v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
examiner then examines the record to determine if there was any credible evidence which would demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8060 - 2005-03-31
examiner then examines the record to determine if there was any credible evidence which would demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8060 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record. At the preliminary hearing, both Cassandra and E.H. testified that Turner encouraged them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36574 - 2009-05-26
in the record. At the preliminary hearing, both Cassandra and E.H. testified that Turner encouraged them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36574 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Cleatus L. Marney, Jr.
reviewing the record, this court is satisfied that the trial court considered the primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16021 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the record, this court is satisfied that the trial court considered the primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16021 - 2017-09-21