Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 14651 - 14660 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125417 - 2017-09-21
a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125417 - 2017-09-21
Groepper Excavating LLC v. Marty Reinier
will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2) (2003-04). We review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25652 - 2006-06-26
will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2) (2003-04). We review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25652 - 2006-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
consider: the defendant's past record of criminal offenses; the defendant's history of undesirable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
consider: the defendant's past record of criminal offenses; the defendant's history of undesirable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587934 - 2022-11-08
a response, but he did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587934 - 2022-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be heard on the petition’s dismissal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
to be heard on the petition’s dismissal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771103 - 2024-03-05
not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771103 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771103 - 2024-03-05
not do so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771103 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be heard on the petition’s dismissal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
to be heard on the petition’s dismissal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
State v. James F. Weber
, namely that his plea was not entered knowingly, freely or voluntarily. ¶6 Here, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15646 - 2005-03-31
, namely that his plea was not entered knowingly, freely or voluntarily. ¶6 Here, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15646 - 2005-03-31
County of Ozaukee v. Jason T. Winkel
, to which defense counsel responded: “Judge, just for the record, it’s my understanding that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11948 - 2005-03-31
, to which defense counsel responded: “Judge, just for the record, it’s my understanding that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11948 - 2005-03-31