Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14661 - 14670 of 49819 for our.
Search results 14661 - 14670 of 49819 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, our review of the Record confirms that the court appropriately considered the relevant sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
, our review of the Record confirms that the court appropriately considered the relevant sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970552 - 2025-06-18
Lutheran Church Extension Fund - Missouri Synod v. Epiphany Lutheran Church
When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3718 - 2005-03-31
When reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811516 - 2024-06-12
our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811516 - 2024-06-12
State v. Joseph M. Caminata
therefore limit our discussion to that issue. ¶5 Caminata contends that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2835 - 2005-03-31
therefore limit our discussion to that issue. ¶5 Caminata contends that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the evidence to support his convictions. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572209 - 2022-10-04
of the evidence to support his convictions. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572209 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for co-defendants. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128335 - 2017-09-21
for co-defendants. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128335 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was not deficient, our ineffectiveness inquiry ends there. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131603 - 2014-12-16
performance was not deficient, our ineffectiveness inquiry ends there. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131603 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93049 - 2014-09-15
granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 640, 646 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of the agency’s decision is limited. State ex rel. Riesch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
.2d 640, 646 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of the agency’s decision is limited. State ex rel. Riesch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34954 - 2008-12-22
. DISCUSSION ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the circuit court and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34954 - 2008-12-22