Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
these powers is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
these powers is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark H. Price
is termed the “objective test.” As its name implies, this test requires that we review the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
is termed the “objective test.” As its name implies, this test requires that we review the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of historical fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. We apply those facts to the applicable law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112226 - 2014-05-29
of historical fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. We apply those facts to the applicable law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112226 - 2014-05-29
State v. Karem Scott
with the mandates of the Fourth Amendment de novo. State v. Harris, ___ Wis.2d ___, ___, 557 N.W.2d 245, 248 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10667 - 2005-03-31
with the mandates of the Fourth Amendment de novo. State v. Harris, ___ Wis.2d ___, ___, 557 N.W.2d 245, 248 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10667 - 2005-03-31
Tony A. Henderson v. Milwaukee County
presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Damaschke, 150 Wis.2d at 283, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Damaschke, 150 Wis.2d at 283, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8483 - 2017-09-19
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8483 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3230 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient. Ladd, 323 Wis. 2d 798, ¶7. ¶12 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
sufficient. Ladd, 323 Wis. 2d 798, ¶7. ¶12 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197316 - 2017-10-04
[PDF]
Michael P. Shea v. Village of Brown Deer Police Commission
that it was not empowered to conduct a de novo review, to take testimony, or to make its own credibility determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14259 - 2014-09-15
that it was not empowered to conduct a de novo review, to take testimony, or to make its own credibility determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14259 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79392 - 2012-03-12
issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79392 - 2012-03-12