Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 30072 for de.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 30072 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2005-03-31
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Mayo, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 101.11, presenting a question of law that we review de novo. See Barry v. Employers Mut. Cas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37948 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 101.11, presenting a question of law that we review de novo. See Barry v. Employers Mut. Cas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37948 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987). However, we review de novo whether the circuit court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1987). However, we review de novo whether the circuit court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137269 - 2015-03-11
[PDF]
State v. Christ Groh
are a correct statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14635 - 2017-09-21
are a correct statement of the law is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14635 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tammy J. Erdmann
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2013-07-01
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5917 - 2013-07-01
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
to arrest him for OWI. Discussion ¶7 On appeal, this court reviews a probable cause determination de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2005-03-31
to arrest him for OWI. Discussion ¶7 On appeal, this court reviews a probable cause determination de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that Unified may be arguing for a de novo standard of review. We do not address this line of argument because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55769 - 2005-10-20
that Unified may be arguing for a de novo standard of review. We do not address this line of argument because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55769 - 2005-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶8 Here, Espitia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. ¶8 Here, Espitia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983226 - 2025-07-16
State v. John G. Yager
statute to undisputed facts. Such an application presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14694 - 2010-07-06
statute to undisputed facts. Such an application presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14694 - 2010-07-06
Frontsheet
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25