Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 68527 for did.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 68527 for did.
State v. Owen Johnson
and seizure of evidence did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We, therefore, affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9395 - 2005-03-31
and seizure of evidence did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We, therefore, affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
he did not raise in his first WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion the issues he raised in his second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
he did not raise in his first WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion the issues he raised in his second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
Barbara J. Delzer v. Donald L. Delzer
) that the circuit court erred in finding as a matter of fact that the parties did not have an oral agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20566 - 2005-12-07
) that the circuit court erred in finding as a matter of fact that the parties did not have an oral agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20566 - 2005-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
witnesses to testify on his behalf. He also argues that his pleas were involuntary because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
witnesses to testify on his behalf. He also argues that his pleas were involuntary because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
Frontsheet
inform the court of any claim under SCR 22.22(3) by June 27, 2011. Attorney Brandt did not file any
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
inform the court of any claim under SCR 22.22(3) by June 27, 2011. Attorney Brandt did not file any
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) he did not receive proper notice of his trial; (2) the circuit court and the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440122 - 2021-10-13
that: (1) he did not receive proper notice of his trial; (2) the circuit court and the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440122 - 2021-10-13
CA Blank Order
, if filed after a direct appeal, unless the defendant shows a sufficient reason why he or she did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145292 - 2015-07-28
, if filed after a direct appeal, unless the defendant shows a sufficient reason why he or she did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145292 - 2015-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
heard knocking on the door, but did not hear any “police” announcement. She explained that she “thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69104 - 2011-08-08
heard knocking on the door, but did not hear any “police” announcement. She explained that she “thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69104 - 2011-08-08
Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
. Jensen did not order a complete electrolyte panel to determine the cause of these ailments. Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14786 - 2005-03-31
. Jensen did not order a complete electrolyte panel to determine the cause of these ailments. Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court did not accept Jackson’s assertion that he informed his trial counsel of Stephanie’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46435 - 2014-09-15
court did not accept Jackson’s assertion that he informed his trial counsel of Stephanie’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46435 - 2014-09-15