Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 64217 for records.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 64217 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92118 - 2014-09-15
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92118 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tyree Goodrich
erroneously exercised its discretion by placing too much emphasis on his prior criminal record and failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7315 - 2017-09-20
erroneously exercised its discretion by placing too much emphasis on his prior criminal record and failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7315 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
2 do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
Harmon’s driving and the deputy’s stop of her car was recorded by a camera in the deputy’s squad car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53667 - 2010-08-23
Harmon’s driving and the deputy’s stop of her car was recorded by a camera in the deputy’s squad car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53667 - 2010-08-23
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142791 - 2015-06-08
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142791 - 2015-06-08
CA Blank Order
and motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99522 - 2013-07-23
and motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99522 - 2013-07-23
State v. Justin H.
would have been a residential treatment center and asserts that the record provides no valid reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9427 - 2005-03-31
would have been a residential treatment center and asserts that the record provides no valid reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9427 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143100 - 2015-06-16
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143100 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records, the judgments are summarily affirmed because we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259892 - 2020-05-12
of the records, the judgments are summarily affirmed because we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259892 - 2020-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the original and supplemental no-merit reports, Kimmons’ response, and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=544041 - 2022-07-20
of the original and supplemental no-merit reports, Kimmons’ response, and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=544041 - 2022-07-20