Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 63556 for records/1000.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 63556 for records/1000.
State v. John C. Vang
). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4400 - 2005-03-31
). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4400 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶12 Moreover, there is nothing in the record to support Dale’s contention that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60261 - 2011-02-22
. ¶12 Moreover, there is nothing in the record to support Dale’s contention that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60261 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record to determine if it supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63381 - 2011-05-02
. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record to determine if it supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63381 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon reviewing the record, as well as the no-merit report, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794874 - 2024-05-02
has not done so. Upon reviewing the record, as well as the no-merit report, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794874 - 2024-05-02
State v. Eric J. Yelk
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Yelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Yelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11852 - 2005-03-31
Cynthia J. Hinojosa v. Joe R. Hinojosa
and the record, we affirm the judgment appealed in case No. 96-2955-FT. We reverse the order appealed in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11565 - 2005-03-31
and the record, we affirm the judgment appealed in case No. 96-2955-FT. We reverse the order appealed in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109997 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
concluded, upon our independent review of the record, that no other issues of arguable merit existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49839 - 2014-09-15
concluded, upon our independent review of the record, that no other issues of arguable merit existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49839 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132842 - 2017-09-21
a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132842 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not challenge the legality of Leblanc’s arrest. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217482 - 2018-08-07
not challenge the legality of Leblanc’s arrest. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217482 - 2018-08-07