Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 58510 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
payments were excessive for 2005 and 2006 because the assessment was too high. After trial, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50469 - 2010-05-26
payments were excessive for 2005 and 2006 because the assessment was too high. After trial, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50469 - 2010-05-26
State v. Trederick Nelson
that the State’s witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
that the State’s witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to withdraw his plea of no contest to a charge of misdemeanor battery because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31758 - 2008-02-12
denying his motion to withdraw his plea of no contest to a charge of misdemeanor battery because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31758 - 2008-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
), and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
), and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State of Wisconsin Resource Center
. Keith contends that the trial court erred when it: (1) dismissed his claim for monetary relief because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15599 - 2005-03-31
. Keith contends that the trial court erred when it: (1) dismissed his claim for monetary relief because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Trederick Nelson
witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14804 - 2017-09-21
witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14804 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lind Excavating & Landscaping, LLC v. David Cihlar
that the trial court did not make specific findings of fact. “We have repeatedly held that, for convenience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19767 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court did not make specific findings of fact. “We have repeatedly held that, for convenience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19767 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction counsel performed deficiently by not alleging trial counsel ineffectiveness on numerous bases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97549 - 2014-09-15
postconviction counsel performed deficiently by not alleging trial counsel ineffectiveness on numerous bases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97549 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
performed deficiently by not alleging trial counsel ineffectiveness on numerous bases. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
performed deficiently by not alleging trial counsel ineffectiveness on numerous bases. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. He argues that phone records indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19
trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. He argues that phone records indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19