Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 72821 for we.
Search results 14671 - 14680 of 72821 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pleas because they were not knowingly and voluntarily entered. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
pleas because they were not knowingly and voluntarily entered. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Suzanne M. Blank v. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance Company
insurance policy. We conclude that the penalty interest applies only to the amount the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9300 - 2017-09-19
insurance policy. We conclude that the penalty interest applies only to the amount the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9300 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 9
of intimidation that occurs after a complaint has been sought. We reject Freer’s interpretation of § 940.44(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44174 - 2014-09-15
of intimidation that occurs after a complaint has been sought. We reject Freer’s interpretation of § 940.44(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44174 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in return for his testimony. We conclude that Felton fails to demonstrate that his proffered expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90808 - 2014-09-15
in return for his testimony. We conclude that Felton fails to demonstrate that his proffered expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90808 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James L. Wright
undercut an agreed-upon sentencing recommendation. We disagree with these contentions and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5981 - 2017-09-19
undercut an agreed-upon sentencing recommendation. We disagree with these contentions and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5981 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 46
§ 51.20(1)(a)1., (am). We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The appellate record does not indicate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264273 - 2020-08-11
§ 51.20(1)(a)1., (am). We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The appellate record does not indicate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264273 - 2020-08-11
[PDF]
State v. Gwendolyn McGee
applies, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17617 - 2017-09-21
applies, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17617 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
best interests. ¶2 We reject Michelizzi’s arguments and conclude a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265292 - 2020-06-23
best interests. ¶2 We reject Michelizzi’s arguments and conclude a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265292 - 2020-06-23
State v. Michael A. Martin
and the record was sent to this court; and (2) he could not seek sentence modification under § 974.06. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7069 - 2005-03-31
and the record was sent to this court; and (2) he could not seek sentence modification under § 974.06. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7069 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
relied on untrue accusations when imposing the sentence. We conclude that Biesterveld is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30433 - 2007-10-02
relied on untrue accusations when imposing the sentence. We conclude that Biesterveld is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30433 - 2007-10-02