Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14681 - 14690 of 30177 for de.
Search results 14681 - 14690 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Heather C.P.
. This court will interpret the requirements of §§ 48.30 and 48.315, STATS., de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12049 - 2017-09-21
. This court will interpret the requirements of §§ 48.30 and 48.315, STATS., de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12049 - 2017-09-21
County of Jefferson v. James I. Krause
facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Trustees of Ind. Univ. v. Town of Rhine, 170 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5479 - 2014-01-14
facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Trustees of Ind. Univ. v. Town of Rhine, 170 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5479 - 2014-01-14
CA Blank Order
). Whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
). Whether the circuit court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
State v. Arthur B. Patton
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
a stop meets statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank Starich
of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶8 Starich argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
of reasonableness is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. ¶8 Starich argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
David R. Barnes v. The Town of Mt. Pleasant
). If so, the inquiry shifts to whether any factual issues exist. See id. Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12364 - 2005-03-31
). If so, the inquiry shifts to whether any factual issues exist. See id. Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12364 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5311 - 2013-07-01
) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5311 - 2013-07-01
Marvin G. Bartholf v. Rita J. Bartholf
exercised its discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16269 - 2011-07-18
exercised its discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16269 - 2011-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
State v. Frederick J. Brissette
on the interpretation of § 980.04(2), Stats., which is a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2005-03-31
on the interpretation of § 980.04(2), Stats., which is a question of law we review de novo. See Grosse v. Protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14317 - 2005-03-31