Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14681 - 14690 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 14681 - 14690 of 58500 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
payments were excessive for 2005 and 2006 because the assessment was too high. After trial, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50469 - 2010-05-26
payments were excessive for 2005 and 2006 because the assessment was too high. After trial, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50469 - 2010-05-26
State v. Trederick Nelson
that the State’s witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
that the State’s witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14804 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to withdraw his plea of no contest to a charge of misdemeanor battery because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31758 - 2008-02-12
denying his motion to withdraw his plea of no contest to a charge of misdemeanor battery because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31758 - 2008-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
), and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
), and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams argues that: (1) he deserves a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59509 - 2011-01-31
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State of Wisconsin Resource Center
. Keith contends that the trial court erred when it: (1) dismissed his claim for monetary relief because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15599 - 2005-03-31
. Keith contends that the trial court erred when it: (1) dismissed his claim for monetary relief because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and denying his motion for a new discharge hearing due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161628 - 2017-09-21
and denying his motion for a new discharge hearing due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Trederick Nelson
witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14804 - 2017-09-21
witnesses falsely testified during his trial. His second challenge asserts that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14804 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lind Excavating & Landscaping, LLC v. David Cihlar
that the trial court did not make specific findings of fact. “We have repeatedly held that, for convenience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19767 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court did not make specific findings of fact. “We have repeatedly held that, for convenience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19767 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Insurance Company (Progressive) after Martin failed to appear at the trial. Martin’s motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
Insurance Company (Progressive) after Martin failed to appear at the trial. Martin’s motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244914 - 2019-08-08
State v. Maurice Clark
of § 813.125(7), Stats. Clark claims the trial court should have dismissed the criminal charge because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12328 - 2005-03-31
of § 813.125(7), Stats. Clark claims the trial court should have dismissed the criminal charge because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12328 - 2005-03-31