Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14691 - 14700 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14691 - 14700 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 140
that we review de novo. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Green, 2008 WI App 78, ¶11, 311 Wis. 2d 715, 753
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54492 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Green, 2008 WI App 78, ¶11, 311 Wis. 2d 715, 753
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timmy Duerr
facts show that a person was under arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11661 - 2017-09-19
facts show that a person was under arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11661 - 2017-09-19
Thomas Konkel v. Town of Elba Town Board
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sean M. Daley
with a statutory interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09
with a statutory interpretation question, which we review de novo. See State v. DeLain, 2005 WI 52, ¶11, 280 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred “presents a question of law [that] we review de novo.” State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247944 - 2019-10-01
is procedurally barred “presents a question of law [that] we review de novo.” State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247944 - 2019-10-01
State v. Lawrence Northern
. § 971.23 is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2009-08-17
. § 971.23 is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2009-08-17
State v. Ryan C. Rumlow
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
State v. Andrew S. Miller
is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5097 - 2005-03-31
is reviewed de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5097 - 2005-03-31