Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14691 - 14700 of 20869 for word.
Search results 14691 - 14700 of 20869 for word.
Firstar Trust Company v. First National Bank of Kenosha
of the will, the words must be given their common and ordinary meaning unless something in the will suggests otherwise
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16875 - 2005-03-31
of the will, the words must be given their common and ordinary meaning unless something in the will suggests otherwise
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16875 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of maintenance on this specific averaging figure. No. 2023AP1569 12 that, in the words of the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821660 - 2024-07-16
of maintenance on this specific averaging figure. No. 2023AP1569 12 that, in the words of the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821660 - 2024-07-16
[PDF]
WI App 47
independently of government. Such a right, in [Lord Edward] Coke’s words, was the “Lex aeterna, the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980292 - 2025-09-18
independently of government. Such a right, in [Lord Edward] Coke’s words, was the “Lex aeterna, the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980292 - 2025-09-18
M. Carol Weissgerber v. Hans Weissgerber, Jr.
to statements of the court that used the word “harsh” in connection with the agreement. We therefore choose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6047 - 2005-03-31
to statements of the court that used the word “harsh” in connection with the agreement. We therefore choose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6047 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesse H. Swinson
penalty than the legislature intended. In other words, because double jeopardy protection prohibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4935 - 2005-03-31
penalty than the legislature intended. In other words, because double jeopardy protection prohibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 94
a person making a WIS. STAT. § 95.19 claim—in other words, a person who suffers a loss “for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32754 - 2014-09-15
a person making a WIS. STAT. § 95.19 claim—in other words, a person who suffers a loss “for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 41
does not use any variation on the word arbitration (such as arbitrate or arbitrability), nor does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109323 - 2017-09-21
does not use any variation on the word arbitration (such as arbitrate or arbitrability), nor does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109323 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 20
parties. This court interprets the words of the enacted law without adding words to the statute. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964973 - 2025-06-03
parties. This court interprets the words of the enacted law without adding words to the statute. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964973 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Walters
. Although the State latches onto the court of appeals' use of the word "compels," State v. Walters, 2003
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16528 - 2017-09-21
. Although the State latches onto the court of appeals' use of the word "compels," State v. Walters, 2003
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16528 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the court’s use of the word “should” excused Delano from appearing. We disagree. In context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109215 - 2014-03-13
argues that the court’s use of the word “should” excused Delano from appearing. We disagree. In context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109215 - 2014-03-13