Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 17500 for Cost.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 17500 for Cost.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the reimbursement amount as “restitution” instead of a “cost.” A “Restitution Information” form submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237939 - 2019-03-26
the reimbursement amount as “restitution” instead of a “cost.” A “Restitution Information” form submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237939 - 2019-03-26
Gary Rowland v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
, as an interested-party-respondent, moves for an award of costs and attorney fees as a sanction for a frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31
, as an interested-party-respondent, moves for an award of costs and attorney fees as a sanction for a frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Thomas E. Zablocki
. In addition, we find it appropriate that Attorney Zablocki pay the No. 1996AP3700-D 2 costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21087 - 2017-09-21
. In addition, we find it appropriate that Attorney Zablocki pay the No. 1996AP3700-D 2 costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21087 - 2017-09-21
Sukhbinder Singh v. Metro Area Properties, Inc.
to retrieve the property. The trial court ruled in his favor and awarded him $400, plus costs. Singh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4958 - 2005-03-31
to retrieve the property. The trial court ruled in his favor and awarded him $400, plus costs. Singh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4958 - 2005-03-31
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
at the City’s expense. Robinson has rejected that offer, claiming that he is entitled to costs and what appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2005-03-31
at the City’s expense. Robinson has rejected that offer, claiming that he is entitled to costs and what appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
the costs of the reinstatement proceeding. ¶3 Attorney Sostarich was admitted to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
the costs of the reinstatement proceeding. ¶3 Attorney Sostarich was admitted to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
[PDF]
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
rejected that offer, claiming that he is entitled to costs and what appears to be calculations for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
rejected that offer, claiming that he is entitled to costs and what appears to be calculations for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Gerald F. Weiland v. Daniel G. Paulin
remanded the cause for a hearing to determine reasonable costs, fees and attorney fees, and directed all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5088 - 2017-09-19
remanded the cause for a hearing to determine reasonable costs, fees and attorney fees, and directed all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5088 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gary Rowland v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
LIRC’s determination. Weyerhaeuser, as an interested-party-respondent, moves for an award of costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14212 - 2014-09-15
LIRC’s determination. Weyerhaeuser, as an interested-party-respondent, moves for an award of costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14212 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial on the first day of the jury trial; and (4) ordered Prost’s trial counsel to pay costs and fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44321 - 2009-12-07
a mistrial on the first day of the jury trial; and (4) ordered Prost’s trial counsel to pay costs and fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44321 - 2009-12-07