Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 29957 for de.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 29957 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56614 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56614 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301558 - 2020-11-04
. This presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301558 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
Badger State Bank v. Roger A. Taylor
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6288 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6288 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Leroy Beilke
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. [I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12430 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. [I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12430 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review, State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410, but we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778702 - 2024-03-21
subject to de novo review, State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410, but we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778702 - 2024-03-21
2008 WI APP 96
, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v. Kramer, 2001 WI 132, ¶17, 248 Wis. 2d 1009, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14
, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v. Kramer, 2001 WI 132, ¶17, 248 Wis. 2d 1009, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court for a trial de novo. In addition to numerous pretrial motions, Deignan filed motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93320 - 2013-03-03
to the circuit court for a trial de novo. In addition to numerous pretrial motions, Deignan filed motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93320 - 2013-03-03
[PDF]
State v. Harrison Franklin
reasonably be questioned presents a question of law for our de novo review. See id. After reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12262 - 2017-09-21
reasonably be questioned presents a question of law for our de novo review. See id. After reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. The burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85990 - 2014-09-15
divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. The burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85990 - 2014-09-15
Terence J. Bilgo v. Don Reineking
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6479 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6479 - 2005-03-31