Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 30177 for de.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and therefore a de facto arrest without probable cause; that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34115 - 2014-09-15
and therefore a de facto arrest without probable cause; that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34115 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 96
136, ¶28, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32841 - 2014-09-15
136, ¶28, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32841 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing and dismissed the case. Keyes and Gruner filed a demand for trial de novo in circuit court. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96519 - 2013-05-08
a hearing and dismissed the case. Keyes and Gruner filed a demand for trial de novo in circuit court. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96519 - 2013-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
2008 WI APP 96
, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v. Kramer, 2001 WI 132, ¶17, 248 Wis. 2d 1009, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14
, and we review questions of law de novo. See State v. Kramer, 2001 WI 132, ¶17, 248 Wis. 2d 1009, 637 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32841 - 2011-06-14
2008 WI APP 75
concluded that the County’s failure to pay the relocation costs was only a de minimus breach because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32342 - 2008-05-27
concluded that the County’s failure to pay the relocation costs was only a de minimus breach because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32342 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
WI App 100
) contemplates a de novo review of the City’s decision. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86314 - 2014-09-15
) contemplates a de novo review of the City’s decision. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86314 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review, State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410, but we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778702 - 2024-03-21
subject to de novo review, State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410, but we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778702 - 2024-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. In addition to numerous pretrial motions, Deignan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93320 - 2014-09-15
appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. In addition to numerous pretrial motions, Deignan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93320 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.” This, of course, is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Morgan, 2002 WI App 124, ¶11, 254 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111137 - 2014-04-28
.” This, of course, is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Morgan, 2002 WI App 124, ¶11, 254 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111137 - 2014-04-28