Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 2401 for nys.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 2401 for nys.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in the context of restitution in a criminal case, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339932 - 2021-02-25
, in the context of restitution in a criminal case, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339932 - 2021-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
that “[a]ny person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide … child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6621 - 2017-09-19
that “[a]ny person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide … child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6621 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, that “[a]ny agreement, declaration, or course of action on the part of an insurance company which leads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118787 - 2014-09-15
, that “[a]ny agreement, declaration, or course of action on the part of an insurance company which leads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118787 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Holly Lynn Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
., in part provides: “The right to inspect or copy a record ... does not apply to ... [a]ny record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7762 - 2017-09-19
., in part provides: “The right to inspect or copy a record ... does not apply to ... [a]ny record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7762 - 2017-09-19
Robert E. Lee & Associates, Inc. v. David J. Peters
that Klemm's counterclaim constitutes a "suit." A "suit" is defined as follows: [A]ny proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
that Klemm's counterclaim constitutes a "suit." A "suit" is defined as follows: [A]ny proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, surprise, or excusable neglect[,]” or § 806.07(1)(h), a catch-all provision allowing relief for “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144101 - 2015-07-06
, surprise, or excusable neglect[,]” or § 806.07(1)(h), a catch-all provision allowing relief for “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144101 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Walter Junior Hamilton
. § 893.87, the ten-year time limit governing “[a]ny action in favor of the state,” applies. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3841 - 2017-09-20
. § 893.87, the ten-year time limit governing “[a]ny action in favor of the state,” applies. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3841 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
to the declaration’s language that “[a]ny lease or oral or written rental agreement …” does not relieve an owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30987 - 2007-12-18
to the declaration’s language that “[a]ny lease or oral or written rental agreement …” does not relieve an owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30987 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
makes a claim for ownership” and “[a]ny documentation supporting those claims.” At her subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233249 - 2019-01-23
makes a claim for ownership” and “[a]ny documentation supporting those claims.” At her subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233249 - 2019-01-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
that a party may be relieved from an order or judgment for “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36586 - 2014-09-15
that a party may be relieved from an order or judgment for “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36586 - 2014-09-15