Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 2421 for nys.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 2421 for nys.
State v. Walter Junior Hamilton
contends instead that Wis. Stat. § 893.87, the ten-year time limit governing “[a]ny action in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3841 - 2005-03-31
contends instead that Wis. Stat. § 893.87, the ten-year time limit governing “[a]ny action in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3841 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in applying the appropriate charging and penalty statutes is in avoiding an ex post facto violation. “[A]ny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709013 - 2023-10-03
in applying the appropriate charging and penalty statutes is in avoiding an ex post facto violation. “[A]ny
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709013 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in the context of restitution in a criminal case, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339932 - 2021-02-25
, in the context of restitution in a criminal case, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339932 - 2021-02-25
Robert E. Lee & Associates, Inc. v. David J. Peters
that Klemm's counterclaim constitutes a "suit." A "suit" is defined as follows: [A]ny proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
that Klemm's counterclaim constitutes a "suit." A "suit" is defined as follows: [A]ny proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10267 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
. § 948.22(2) provides that “[a]ny person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6621 - 2005-03-31
. § 948.22(2) provides that “[a]ny person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6621 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
part, as “[a]ny crime specified in s. … 943.10 … that is determined, in a proceeding under [WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66108 - 2014-09-15
part, as “[a]ny crime specified in s. … 943.10 … that is determined, in a proceeding under [WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66108 - 2014-09-15
Sandra L. Shirk v. Bowling, Inc.
a judgment if there are "[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment." The test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17466 - 2005-03-31
a judgment if there are "[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment." The test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17466 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert E. Lee & Associates, Inc. v. David J. Peters
as follows: [A]ny proceeding by one person or persons against another or others in a court of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10267 - 2017-09-20
as follows: [A]ny proceeding by one person or persons against another or others in a court of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10267 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Agreement states that “[a]ny Person dealing with [Keylian], other than a Member, No. 2022AP1110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=740481 - 2023-12-14
Agreement states that “[a]ny Person dealing with [Keylian], other than a Member, No. 2022AP1110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=740481 - 2023-12-14
State v. Michael Doud
restitution context, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid out because of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31
restitution context, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid out because of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31