Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 77620 for search which.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 77620 for search which.
COURT OF APPEALS
searches in the DNA database, received “cold hits” indicating a match between Ellis’s DNA profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88999 - 2012-11-05
searches in the DNA database, received “cold hits” indicating a match between Ellis’s DNA profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88999 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Singkeo Inphachack
was lawfully stopped by police; he challenges the search and arrest. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9362 - 2017-09-19
was lawfully stopped by police; he challenges the search and arrest. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9362 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rolando M. Tong
of the search. He claims there is nothing in Powell’s affidavit from which it reasonably may be inferred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
of the search. He claims there is nothing in Powell’s affidavit from which it reasonably may be inferred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because the warrant authorizing the search of his cell phone was defective and (2) erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94286 - 2014-09-15
because the warrant authorizing the search of his cell phone was defective and (2) erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94286 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
his suppression motion because the warrant authorizing the search of his cell phone was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19
his suppression motion because the warrant authorizing the search of his cell phone was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and subsequent search of his person. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 We briefly review the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102003 - 2013-09-16
and subsequent search of his person. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 We briefly review the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102003 - 2013-09-16
State v. Kelly L. McCray
of a suppression motion which focused on evidence seized following the execution of a no-knock warrant at someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13046 - 2005-03-31
of a suppression motion which focused on evidence seized following the execution of a no-knock warrant at someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13046 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelly L. McCray
of cocaine with intent to deliver, based on the denial of a suppression motion which focused on evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13046 - 2017-09-21
of cocaine with intent to deliver, based on the denial of a suppression motion which focused on evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13046 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
during an investigative stop and subsequent search of his person. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102003 - 2017-09-21
during an investigative stop and subsequent search of his person. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102003 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 131
to unanimously agree on which he did. Second, he asserts the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33501 - 2011-06-14
to unanimously agree on which he did. Second, he asserts the circuit court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33501 - 2011-06-14