Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 21316 for warrants.
Search results 1471 - 1480 of 21316 for warrants.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing. He therefore contended that this information constituted a new factor warranting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715018 - 2023-10-17
sentencing. He therefore contended that this information constituted a new factor warranting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715018 - 2023-10-17
State v. Deborah P. Dodski
violated the Fourth Amendment because the seizure occurred without a warrant. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3815 - 2005-03-31
violated the Fourth Amendment because the seizure occurred without a warrant. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the officers learned that he had multiple outstanding Oneida County warrants. The officers confirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659969 - 2023-05-23
, the officers learned that he had multiple outstanding Oneida County warrants. The officers confirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659969 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Mark H. Brooks
the facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion. See id. The trial court’s findings of fact must be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15799 - 2017-09-21
the facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion. See id. The trial court’s findings of fact must be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
policy does not constitute a new factor warranting sentencing relief. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149448 - 2017-09-21
policy does not constitute a new factor warranting sentencing relief. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149448 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing constitute new factors that warrant resentencing. We first consider Klein’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31684 - 2008-01-30
at sentencing constitute new factors that warrant resentencing. We first consider Klein’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31684 - 2008-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a warrant. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Police entered Richards’s home at 3008 North 60th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67144 - 2014-09-15
a warrant. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Police entered Richards’s home at 3008 North 60th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67144 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a warrant. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Police entered Richards’s home at 3008 North 60th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
a warrant. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Police entered Richards’s home at 3008 North 60th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred in concluding that no new factor was established warranting a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred in concluding that no new factor was established warranting a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
State v. Justin P. Brandl
they entered his home without a warrant. Because an objective police officer could have believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26040 - 2006-07-31
they entered his home without a warrant. Because an objective police officer could have believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26040 - 2006-07-31