Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 97687 for court records search online.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 97687 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we also “defer[] to the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499445 - 2022-03-24
, we also “defer[] to the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499445 - 2022-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in the record and the court relied on appropriate and applicable law. Id. ¶7 “[A]lthough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189455 - 2017-09-21
the facts in the record and the court relied on appropriate and applicable law. Id. ¶7 “[A]lthough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189455 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for SAP. Taking the circuit court’s statements in context, the record supports the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
for SAP. Taking the circuit court’s statements in context, the record supports the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed in the circuit court by Penkalski, and the circuit court’s orders. The record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639381 - 2023-03-30
filed in the circuit court by Penkalski, and the circuit court’s orders. The record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639381 - 2023-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this court to construe his § 974.06 motion as a habeas petition. We are bound by the record as it comes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04
this court to construe his § 974.06 motion as a habeas petition. We are bound by the record as it comes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The record supports the court’s finding. Rogers testified that the foster parents for S.-L.E.M. and S.M.M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250039 - 2019-11-19
.” The record supports the court’s finding. Rogers testified that the foster parents for S.-L.E.M. and S.M.M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250039 - 2019-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an appellate court, we are limited to the record as it comes to us from the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668838 - 2023-06-15
an appellate court, we are limited to the record as it comes to us from the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668838 - 2023-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
occurs “if the record shows that the [circuit] court failed to exercise its discretion, the facts fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
occurs “if the record shows that the [circuit] court failed to exercise its discretion, the facts fail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170582 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim, noting that the record established the total amount of restitution as $2,643.04. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
claim, noting that the record established the total amount of restitution as $2,643.04. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18

