Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 29823 for des.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81567 - 2014-09-15
4 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81567 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183369 - 2017-09-21
to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183369 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26373 - 2017-09-21
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26373 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
placement is warranted based on the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Walworth Cnty. v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136965 - 2017-09-21
placement is warranted based on the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Walworth Cnty. v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136965 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48465 - 2014-09-15
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48465 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
retained competency, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
retained competency, is a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36121 - 2009-04-08
Town of Kronenwetter v. City of Mosinee
. When reviewing summary judgment, our review is de novo. We review the record according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9140 - 2005-03-31
. When reviewing summary judgment, our review is de novo. We review the record according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See Washburn Cnty. v. Smith, 2008 WI 23, ¶16, 308 Wis. 2d 65, 746 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31