Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 68502 for did.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
, not counsel; a mental disease or defect plea was a reasonable option in this case; counsel did not inform Hunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70955 - 2011-09-14
, not counsel; a mental disease or defect plea was a reasonable option in this case; counsel did not inform Hunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70955 - 2011-09-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
to police because Sturm did not No. 2006AP535-CR 2 understand his Miranda1 rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27597 - 2014-09-15
to police because Sturm did not No. 2006AP535-CR 2 understand his Miranda1 rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27597 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, the circuit court did not summarize the elements of the crime, ask trial counsel to place his explanation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91053 - 2014-09-15
, the circuit court did not summarize the elements of the crime, ask trial counsel to place his explanation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91053 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
$1,682.50. When Carmichael did not cure the default, Landmark commenced a small claims replevin action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
$1,682.50. When Carmichael did not cure the default, Landmark commenced a small claims replevin action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68384 - 2011-07-25
State v. Carmen L. Harrell
) by deciding that the new(ly declared) factor did not frustrate the sentencing court’s original intent; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25835 - 2006-08-29
) by deciding that the new(ly declared) factor did not frustrate the sentencing court’s original intent; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25835 - 2006-08-29
State v. Earl DeWayne Phiffer
the framework under which he believes he is entitled to a new trial,[1] he argues generally, as he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
the framework under which he believes he is entitled to a new trial,[1] he argues generally, as he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19282 - 2005-08-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury found grounds did not exist to terminate R.G.’s parental rights. N.C. contends her appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876587 - 2024-11-20
a jury found grounds did not exist to terminate R.G.’s parental rights. N.C. contends her appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876587 - 2024-11-20
Waylon M. Redding v. David H. Schwarz
.” She did not explain why the DOC simultaneously sought revocation and the additional jail term. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3561 - 2005-03-31
.” She did not explain why the DOC simultaneously sought revocation and the additional jail term. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3561 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Medina
at the outset that Medina has already had a direct appeal from his conviction, and that he did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6197 - 2005-03-31
at the outset that Medina has already had a direct appeal from his conviction, and that he did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Conners
climbed up the steps to the porch and peered through the screen door into the mobile home. He did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2264 - 2017-09-19
climbed up the steps to the porch and peered through the screen door into the mobile home. He did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2264 - 2017-09-19