Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14711 - 14720 of 73792 for we.
Search results 14711 - 14720 of 73792 for we.
State v. Glenndale R. Black
to be served consecutively to one another. We affirm. I. Background. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10232 - 2005-03-31
to be served consecutively to one another. We affirm. I. Background. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10232 - 2005-03-31
Donald A. Thompson v. Lacrosse County Board of Adjustment
Ordinance (SZO). We affirm. ISSUES AND DECISION The Thompsons present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8062 - 2005-03-31
Ordinance (SZO). We affirm. ISSUES AND DECISION The Thompsons present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Duane Kuester v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
for certiorari review of the Board’s decision. We conclude the rule is valid and was lawfully applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6034 - 2017-09-19
for certiorari review of the Board’s decision. We conclude the rule is valid and was lawfully applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6034 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Stephen J. Kasun, Jr. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
arguments, all of which we reject. Accordingly, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Stephen Kasun worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3050 - 2017-09-19
arguments, all of which we reject. Accordingly, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Stephen Kasun worked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3050 - 2017-09-19
City of Sun Prairie v. William D. Davis
in the City’s brief. Because we conclude that a municipal judge has inherent authority to order a civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12588 - 2005-03-31
in the City’s brief. Because we conclude that a municipal judge has inherent authority to order a civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12588 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius R. Powell
harsh. We affirm. I. ¶2 Demetrius R. Powell was tried for shooting and killing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5833 - 2005-03-31
harsh. We affirm. I. ¶2 Demetrius R. Powell was tried for shooting and killing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5833 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on his motion. We reject his arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 11, 2009, two men were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245321 - 2019-08-20
on his motion. We reject his arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 11, 2009, two men were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245321 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. We reject Jelks’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
and contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. We reject Jelks’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
Amy Remiszewski v. American Family Insurance Company
-appeals this ruling. ¶2 We conclude that both the reducing clauses and the anti-stacking provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6939 - 2017-09-20
-appeals this ruling. ¶2 We conclude that both the reducing clauses and the anti-stacking provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6939 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a mistrial. We conclude that giving the Allen charge to the jury once and then referencing it again did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28476 - 2014-09-15
for a mistrial. We conclude that giving the Allen charge to the jury once and then referencing it again did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28476 - 2014-09-15