Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14721 - 14730 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14721 - 14730 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶5 Summary judgments are reviewed de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Bilda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
¶5 Summary judgments are reviewed de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Bilda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Victor M. Kennedy
review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69, 76 (1996). We may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11216 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69, 76 (1996). We may dispose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11216 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randy A. Davis
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5835 - 2017-09-19
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5835 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s conclusion of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis. 2d 632, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15
court’s conclusion of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis. 2d 632, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
this state.” No. 97-2692 3 Oimoen sought a de novo hearing in circuit court and, as indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21
this state.” No. 97-2692 3 Oimoen sought a de novo hearing in circuit court and, as indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joseph Sorrel v. Livesey Company LLC
¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25035 - 2017-09-21
¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and apply these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113843 - 2017-09-21
, and apply these statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113843 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d 857
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103082 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis. 2d 617, 665 N.W.2d 857
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103082 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John A. Zulliger v. Town of Harding
the State.4 ¶4 We review de novo a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, accepting all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2482 - 2017-09-19
the State.4 ¶4 We review de novo a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, accepting all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2482 - 2017-09-19