Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14721 - 14730 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14721 - 14730 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2006AP1985 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 Michael L.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29037 - 2014-09-15
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2006AP1985 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 Michael L.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29037 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether we apply a “clearly erroneous” or “de novo” standard of review. Thus, we do not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05
of whether we apply a “clearly erroneous” or “de novo” standard of review. Thus, we do not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision on a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
decision on a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Neil Montoto
instruction violated a defendant’s constitutional rights by misleading the jury is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5371 - 2017-09-19
instruction violated a defendant’s constitutional rights by misleading the jury is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5371 - 2017-09-19
Vernon County v. Gary E. Wolfgram
review de novo. See id. at 137-38. ¶7 An investigative stop is a “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4534 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See id. at 137-38. ¶7 An investigative stop is a “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4534 - 2005-03-31
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
these powers is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
these powers is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4469 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 720 N.W.2d 695. We review questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35201 - 2010-01-12
, 720 N.W.2d 695. We review questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35201 - 2010-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
, subject to de novo review, see Powell v. State, 86 Wis.2d 51, 62-68, 271 N.W.2d 610, 615-18 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10432 - 2005-03-31
, subject to de novo review, see Powell v. State, 86 Wis.2d 51, 62-68, 271 N.W.2d 610, 615-18 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10432 - 2005-03-31
State v. John G. Yager
statute to undisputed facts. Such an application presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14694 - 2005-03-31
statute to undisputed facts. Such an application presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14694 - 2005-03-31