Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14721 - 14730 of 50100 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123438 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854290 - 2024-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS
failed to address the sufficiency of the evidence. ¶8 Our review on certiorari is limited to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63156 - 2011-04-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP1668 2 our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156068 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Harlan Richards v. Jane Gamble
Richards’s prison trust fund accounts pending our determination on this issue. Thereafter, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3789 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512169 - 2022-04-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617807 - 2023-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06

State v. James R. Wolfe
, 270. ¶7 Our supreme court concluded that the near maximum sentence was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19696 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
meritorious appellate issue that could be raised based on the issues Barnes has brought to our attention
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141369 - 2017-09-21