Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14721 - 14730 of 50100 for our.
Search results 14721 - 14730 of 50100 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
of inaccurate information. Our review of Grant’s appellate brief persuades us that the State accurately frames
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70792 - 2011-09-12
of inaccurate information. Our review of Grant’s appellate brief persuades us that the State accurately frames
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70792 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93049 - 2014-09-15
granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192350 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.23(3). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192350 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576898 - 2022-10-11
upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576898 - 2022-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the trial transcript and other evidence, as partially summarized here, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602633 - 2022-12-20
on our review of the trial transcript and other evidence, as partially summarized here, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602633 - 2022-12-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843470 - 2024-08-29
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843470 - 2024-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Rita A. Whitish
. Tarantino, 157 Wis.2d 199, 218, 458 N.W.2d 582, 590 (Ct. App. 1990). We will only substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9087 - 2017-09-19
. Tarantino, 157 Wis.2d 199, 218, 458 N.W.2d 582, 590 (Ct. App. 1990). We will only substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9087 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123438 - 2017-09-21
merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins with a “presumption that the [circuit] court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854290 - 2024-09-26
for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854290 - 2024-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to address the sufficiency of the evidence. ¶8 Our review on certiorari is limited to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63156 - 2011-04-25
failed to address the sufficiency of the evidence. ¶8 Our review on certiorari is limited to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63156 - 2011-04-25