Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14751 - 14760 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 14751 - 14760 of 64042 for records/1000.
State v. Mary F.-R.
the record on appeal for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have reached, but did not. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
the record on appeal for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have reached, but did not. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
State v. James W. Woller
its discretion. Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶17. First, the record must indicate that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20253 - 2005-11-14
its discretion. Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶17. First, the record must indicate that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20253 - 2005-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Johnnie Hunter
, however, the prosecutor conceded that the computer print-out of his record might have been inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8346 - 2017-09-19
, however, the prosecutor conceded that the computer print-out of his record might have been inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8346 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are not clearly erroneous based on the record. See Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. Credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212401 - 2018-05-09
are not clearly erroneous based on the record. See Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. Credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212401 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63381 - 2014-09-15
may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63381 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John S. Bergmann
has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. See id. The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15018 - 2017-09-21
has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. See id. The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
, the parties submitted memorandum briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16109 - 2017-09-21
, the parties submitted memorandum briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as 1 This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372694 - 2021-06-02
of the record as 1 This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372694 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, this court concludes that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994702 - 2025-08-12
and an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, this court concludes that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994702 - 2025-08-12
State v. Richard J. Olson
. However, because there is a factual dispute in the record, we remand to the circuit court to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3497 - 2005-03-31
. However, because there is a factual dispute in the record, we remand to the circuit court to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3497 - 2005-03-31