Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14761 - 14770 of 37949 for ph d.

[PDF] Case of the Month - March 2010
Court decision, Judge Steven D. Ebert presiding. 2008AP658 State v. Michael A. Sveum
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/march10.pdf - 2010-03-02

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
. Chisholm, Kelly J. McKnight, E. Michael McCann, Daniel D. Blinka, James M. Brennan, Ben K. Kempinen
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210867 - 2018-04-05

[PDF] Supreme Court rules petition 10-04 supporting memo
David T. Prosser, Jr. Justice Patience D. Roggensack Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler Justice
/supreme/docs/1004petitionsupport.pdf - 2010-03-22

[PDF] Supreme Court Rules petition 11-03 - petitioner's response
. (c) The county executive, county administrator, or administrative coordinator. (d) The clerk
/supreme/docs/1103petitionerreponse.pdf - 2011-12-07

[PDF] Amended rules petition 07-08
Walsh Bradley Justice N. Patrick Crooks Justice David Prosser, Jr. Justice Patience D. Roggensack
/supreme/docs/0708petitionamend.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 20-09 - Comments from Kristin M. Slonski, Director of Litigation, Wisconsin Judicare, Inc.
other interested persons and the public at large, and SECTION 10. Section 885.54 (1) (d), permitting
/supreme/docs/2009commentsslonski.pdf - 2021-02-22

[PDF] Rules Petition 08-23
Justice Ann Walsh Bradley Justice N. Patrick Crooks Justice David Prosser, Jr. Justice Patience D
/supreme/docs/0823petition.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 19-13 - Letter to David Pruhs, Executive Secretary, WI Family Court Commissioners Association
further comment. (b) Reject the rule proposed without further comment. (d) Refer the rule petition
/supreme/docs/1913letdpruhs.pdf - 2019-08-14

[PDF] Response of Dean, Marquette University Law School
, Joseph D. Kearney Dean and Professor of Law
/news/docs/proposedmod_mardeanresponse.pdf - 2020-05-19

[PDF] Oral Argument Schedule - November 2005
on briefs, without oral argument, the following case: #03AP587-D - Office of Lawyer Regulation v
/sc/orasch/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19673 - 2017-09-21