Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14761 - 14770 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient facts to state a claim challenging the validity of the appraisal based upon Funding’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100215 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
possible claims that Seibert’s complaint contained. It ruled that some of them did not state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29513 - 2007-06-27

[PDF] State v. Daniel T. Shea
, rejecting Shea’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2759 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, rejecting multiple of his claims on their merits and concluding he had forfeited his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01

[PDF] Angela Van Ess v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System
the Board, thereby abrogating the Board's common law sovereign immunity, by enacting the notice of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8120 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Victor Raygoza
. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) motion. 1 He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7533 - 2017-09-19

Angela Van Ess v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System
the Board, thereby abrogating the Board's common law sovereign immunity, by enacting the notice of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8120 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Keith’s current claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144241 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
withdrawal claim, notwithstanding the fact that his conviction has already been affirmed by this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163508 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
is whether the court erred by rejecting Reemer’s attempt to defend against their adverse possession claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21