Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14761 - 14770 of 63951 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
is reliable.” See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. The record shows that the answer to that question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41826 - 2009-10-05

COURT OF APPEALS
and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. “The primary considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
judgment for multiple reasons.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11

[PDF] State v. Kevin D.K.
will search the record for evidence to support the trial court’s findings of fact. See Becker v. Zoschke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3990 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 5 recorded, that neither he nor Holly consented to its recording, and that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170358 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record related to the plea hearing. But when testifying at the motion hearing, Braun struggled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831490 - 2024-07-31

[PDF] Jon A. Haas v. Vance R. Stark
these discretionary decisions if the record shows that the court “logically interpreted the facts and applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2964 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unless totally unsupported by the facts apparently in the record.’” State v. Garfoot, 207 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106614 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713964 - 2023-10-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
showing a genuine dispute.” Id. at 664; see also WIS. STAT. § 802.08(3). Then, if “the record taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587418 - 2022-11-08