Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14771 - 14780 of 64758 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 14771 - 14780 of 64758 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Jason D. Schultz
. 1987). An appellate court will search the record to determine whether the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8666 - 2005-03-31
. 1987). An appellate court will search the record to determine whether the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003403 - 2025-09-03
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003403 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Matthew
an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford plea. State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9664 - 2017-09-19
an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford plea. State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9664 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795923 - 2024-05-07
a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795923 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Nelson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76820 - 2014-09-15
allegations or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Nelson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142829 - 2017-09-21
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142829 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by cites to the record. Our review of the testimony shows that Kielisch was permitted to testify about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
by cites to the record. Our review of the testimony shows that Kielisch was permitted to testify about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211163 - 2018-04-12
was sent a copy of the report but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211163 - 2018-04-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003403 - 2025-09-03
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003403 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and Oliver’s responses, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22
of the no-merit report and Oliver’s responses, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22